×
Skip to main content

Sunday, 29 September 2024 | 01:03 am

|   Subscribe   |   donation   Support Us    |   donation

Log in
Register


MORE COVERAGE

Order of Gujarat State Waqf Tribunal which halted the construction of a railway track near 'Firoz Saheb ni dargah' is set aside by Gujarat High Court

| Satyaagrah | Law
Gujarat State Waqf Tribunal had granted an injunction and had directed the District Collector to seek the permission from the Waqf Board

Plea rejected by Allahabad High Court to open 22 'closed rooms' of Taj Mahal to research the real history, says "matter should be left to historians. Please don't take us to the historical facts which you believe"

| Satyaagrah | Law
The court asked the petitioner, "You hold that the structure (Taj Mahal) was not made by Shah Jahan? Are we here to pronounce any verdict? Please don't take us to the historical facts which you believe"

Writ petition of Irfan scrapped by Allahabad High Court of seeking permission for Azaan on loudspeakers in the mosque, says ‘not a fundamental right’: Read details of the case

| Satyaagrah | Law
The petitioner alleged that the rejection of permission to play Azaan on the loudspeaker was 'illegal' and violative of his fundamental rights. After hearing his counsel, the Allahabad High Court observed that the use of loudspeakers from mosques is not a fundamental right

In a case regarding child custody of 11-year-old Kanak, Court orders minor girl to be sent to Nari Niketan: Rajasthan

| Satyaagrah | Law
Nari Niketan Trust runs an orphanage that facilitates both national and inter-country adoptions and is a home for abandoned children in Jalandhar, Punjab. It also runs a school for underprivileged children

Plea of MP Navneet Rana and husband MLA Ravi Rana to quash FIR for the gruesome and heinous crime of reciting Hanuman Chalisa outside Matoshree dismissed by Bombay HC: Justices stated that it was devoid of merit

| Satyaagrah | Law
On Sunday, a second FIR was filed against the Ranas under IPC Section 353 for alleged assault on a public servant to prevent him/her from doing official duties, to which the Ranas objected and moved the court

Bulldozer did deserving action in Jahangirpuri: Illegal Masjid gate razed, mazaar on-road and other encroachments removed before SC halts demolition drive: Only encroachment of government land demolished

| Satyaagrah | Law
The demolition drive by NMDC aimed at ending the scourge of illegal encroachment in Delhi's Jahangirpuri demolished the gate of a local mosque, a mazaar built illegally on the road, and other encroachments before SC order halted the drive

Controversial Marxist leader Brinda Karat reaches Jahangirpuri to implement Supreme Court order, fanatic Leftist journos outrage over order not being followed immediately and took to Twitter to attack NDMC officials

| Satyaagrah | Law
Within an hour after the Supreme Court ordered to maintain the status quo in demolition drive by NDMC in Delhi’s Jahangirpuri, Communist leader Brinda Karat arrived in Jahangirpuri with the SC order asking authorities to stop the demolition immediately

Notice issued to Central govt on plea challenging the constitutional validity of Waqf Act 1995 by Delhi High Court: Ashwini Upadhyay filed the plea that Waqf Act is antithetical to Secularism in India

| Satyaagrah | Law
Delhi High Court issued notices to Ministries of Home, Law & Justice, Minority Affairs, the Law Commission and the Central Waqf Board asking them to file their counter affidavits within 4 weeks

Supreme Court stays Allahabad HC order to take over land from Mohammad Ali Jauhar Trust: State Govt of UP allotted 400 acres to the Trust that violated the conditions and built a Mosque instead of a university

| Satyaagrah | Law
The Trust argued that the mosque was built for the teachers and non-teaching staff who are residing on the university premise

Husband submitted that his wife living separately for 10 years, she implicated false 498-A IPC, in which he was acquitted, and prayed for divorce on ground of mental cruelty: Court concurred disputes not serious

| Satyaagrah | Law
Court concurred with the submissions of the Respondent/wife, opining that the disputes between the couple were not serious in nature and that the same could not amount to mental cruelty on the part of the wife towards the husband
SATYAAGRAH TWITTER
FOLLOW US