"1 Muslim = 10 Hindus": Pakistan doesn’t hate India, it hates Hindus. Right from ideological founder of Pakistan to physical founder to etymology to liberals to common masses to extremists to artists to politicians to everything in Pakistan hates Hindus

Most Indians don’t understand Pakistan. Forget about novices or liberals living in dreams, even the learned despite all their sincerity fail to crack the miserable Pakistani psyche. 

Pakistan doesn’t hate India. Pakistan hates Hindus. Right from the ideological founder of Pakistan to the physical founder to etymology to liberals to common masses to extremists to artists to politicians to everything (minus the non-Muslims) in Pakistan hates Hindus.

This hate has ideological roots in the sacred texts of the majority of Pakistanis.

Translations of the holy book [9:5]:

Sahih International: And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.

Translations of the holy book [98:6]:

Sahih International: Indeed, they who disbelieved among the People of the Scripture and the polytheists will be in the fire of Hell, abiding eternally therein. Those are the worst of creatures.

Translations of the holy book [9/29]:

Sahih International: Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.

We would be happy to believe that “Slaying of idolaters” in the holy book actually meant “empowerment of idolaters” just like Faiz’s “Sab but uthvaaye jaayenge.. bus naam rahega Allah ka” actually meant “when falsehood will perish and the truth will prevail” as suggested by Javed Akhtar and Barkha Dutt. But the problem is that Sharjeel Imams and Abu Baqr Al Baghdadis read “slaying of idolaters” as “slaying of idolaters” and not “empowerment of idolaters”. 

This rabid hate comes with a cost which is idiocy, hypocrisy, perpetual humiliation, and defeat Pakistan and Islamists of the subcontinent have become the epitome of. Hindu hate was the basis of the creation of Pakistan. For that, villainization of Hindus and victimization of Muslims was imperative. But how could the superior faith become so helplessly weak in front of Kafir idolaters? How could Muslims be superior race and victims at the same time? 

This paradox was explained with two assumptions. Pakistan’s holy books, textbooks, Generals, politicians, Mullahs & ruling establishment taught following to Pakistanis since childhood

1. Muslims are a martial race. They are fair, handsome, tall, well-built, fearless, born warriors, conquerors, and big-hearted people. 

1 Muslim = 10 Hindus in war. Muslims fight frontal wars.

2. Hindu is Baniya (clever trader). He is dark-skinned, ugly, meek, weak, cowardly, callous, cunning, shrewd, small-hearted, and incapable of fighting. Hindus were slaves of Muslims for 1000 years. Hindu conspires and backstabs.

1 Muslim >= 10 Kafirs as per Holy Book 8/65. You may find it absurd but this has been the official policy of the Pakistan Army vis a vis India. All four wars Pakistan initiated against India actually had this 1:10 theorem at play. Almost all Army chiefs and PMs of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan religiously believed in a Muslim’s magical prowess against weak Hindu Baniya described in Islamic Holy Book.

Translations of the holy book [8:65]:

Sahih International: O Prophet, urge the believers to battle. If there are among you twenty [who are] steadfast, they will overcome two hundred. And if there are among you one hundred [who are] steadfast, they will overcome a thousand of those who have disbelieved because they are a people who do not understand.

Few examples:

Tahir Mehdi, a Pakistani columnist exposes Pakistan in Dawn – Have you ever watched the Independence Day play in your neighborhood school? Please do, the next time you get an opportunity. A boy dressed in a dhoti, with no top or maybe a vest and a shiny bald head but with a small head of hair dangling funnily on one side of the skull represents India. He has a shrewd smile on his face and his character personifies callousness and insensitivity. He is a traitor who ditches poor Muslims to side with an oppressive white man. It is a theatrical rendering of the narrative: all Indians are Hindus and all Hindus are baniyas. No need to add that baniyas are abhorring creatures.

A baniya in my backyard - https://www.dawn.com/news/718606/a-baniya-in-my-backyard

Outlook 16 June 2008, page 24 reads – Dr. Babur quotes junior Muslim officers describing their motivational lectures, “we are taught that in the Quran one Muslim is equal to 10 Kafirs and after every lecture, slogans praising God and Caliph Ali are raised”

Sarmad Iqbal, a Pakistani writes in Quint – I also vividly remember how my textbooks in primary school and even in secondary schools, particularly in the Urdu language… …were replete with references like, “We Muslims were strong and brave so we defeated the weak, cunning and clever Hindu Indian army”. Central Asian invaders like Mahmud Ghaznavi who destroyed and desecrated one of the most sacred Hindu temples in India “Somnath” (in the Indian state of Gujarat) were often glorified.

India-Pakistan cricket matches are marked by commentary such as – “Is Hindu team ko hamaray Shaheenoon nay harana hai (Our hawks [reference to Pakistani cricket team] will have to defeat this Hindu team [refering to the Indian cricket team]”.

Mass rallies in support of “Kashmiri Muslim brothers” led us to believe that the Hindu Indian army is killing our Muslim brothers and is being endorsed by a government that has the dimag (mind) of a Hindu Baniya (a clever Hindu merchant).

Manzoor Turabi, Researcher, Pakistan Project, IDSA writes – Almost on a regular basis, the Urdu newspapers carry articles and editorials portraying India as a country ruled by ‘Hindu Baniyas’ who, from their point of view, are ‘enemies of Muslims’.

Sabir Nazar writes in Dawn – Indian soldiers are cowards. One Muslim soldier is equal to 10 Hindu soldiers (Hamid Gul) … but we never won any war against India.

Irfan Husain, Pak’s ex-civil servant who wrote speeches of PM ZA Bhutto writes in Dawn – In the evenings at the army mess where I had a room…While my shooting skills improved on the rifle range, I don’t think I learned anything of value. But I did get an insight into the insularity of military life. For one, our commanding officer, a reasonably bright lieutenant-colonel, was convinced that one Muslim soldier was equal to 10 of his Hindu foes.

And for all the talk of one Muslim soldier being equal to 10 Hindus, we have lost each of the wars we have fought with India.

Ardeshir Cowasjee writes in Dawn- It is of no use us propagating the myth that one Pakistani soldier is equal in strength and courage to five Indian soldiers. Our retired generals, colonels, air marshals, wing-commanders, admirals, and commodores do us a disservice when they air their views…

Stephen P. Cohen, American author, Political Scientist, and Professor of Security Studies writes- “One Pakistani soldier is equal to ten or more Indians – Pakistan adopted it as a way of demonstrating to foreigners… that a small amount of assistance to Pakistan could offset the Indian behemoth. If one Pakistani equaled ten or twenty Hindu Indian soldiers, then Pakistan could overcome the disadvantages of its apparent size and resources…”

Ayaz Amir, former Muslim League N leader, and Pak columnist writes – from Kashmir to Kargil, and the 1965 war in between — were started by us, convinced of victory because we had fed ourselves on the notion that one Muslim soldier was equal to ten Hindu soldiers.

The book Dirty Hands and Vicious Deeds, edited by Samuel Totten, eminent Professor of history reads- “Proclaimed itself the inheritor of the martial tradition of Islam, the successor of Timurlane and Nadir Shah and all the other Islamic conquerers of India.” It became a common theme among the ranks of the military, a matter of unquestioning bravado turned into the conviction of their own innate prowess as soldiers of Islam, that one Pakistani soldier was equal, if not better, in fighting spirit than 10 Hindus. Out of such thinking infused with racial bigotry and religious chauvinism, the senior commanders of the Pakistan Army were blinded by their own limited vision of the complex reality of politics.

To cut long story short, for an Islamist, a Hindu is a Baniya/weak community. Muslims are a martial race. Muslims ruled Hindus for 1000 years. Still, Muslims are victims of Hindu oppression. How? Because Chalaak Baniya sided with the British to end 1000 years long humiliation in form of Muslim rule. As per history taught in Pakistan, Hindus invited the British to conquer India. Muslims fought the British for independence while Hindu Baniya was acting as a loyal servants of the Queen. Since Hindus were not able to fight Muslims with muscle power (1 Muslim > 10 Hindus), he backstabbed Muslims and joined hands with the British. This may be called as Yahood o Hanood ki Saazish a term popular in Pakistan that means conspiracy of Jews & Hindus. 

(Theory of Muslim martial struggle against British is a hoax. Those versed in history know that Jinnah was a British stooge. Muslim League – sole representative of the majority of Muslims in a pre-partition era – had its first objective as “To promote, among the Musalmans of India, feelings of loyalty to the British Government, and to remove any misconception that may arise as to the intention of Government with regard to any of its measures” [Dhaka Resolution, December 30, 1906])

The situation of Islamists in India is more complex. Being a minority, their claims of Muslim superiority and attempts to villainization of Hindus have to be subtle. I am not suggesting Indian Islamists are any better. Remember that Pakistan was the brainchild of Indian Islamists.

Dar ul Uloom Deoband’s (Uttar Pradesh, India) Fatwa states a Muslim shouldn’t even show tolerance and morality to Non-Muslims, and shouldn’t make them friends!

Fatwas like – asking Muslims to not be friends with Hindus – are regularly issued from Dar ul Uloom, Deoband, India. Deoband is a suburb in UP state where 80% population is Hindu (at least on papers). In principle, the Islamists of India and the state of Pakistan are inseparable. They carry equal hate, disgust, and venom for Hindus.

Remember Sukhi Lala (Lala is a synonym of Baniya widely used in Punjab) of 1957 Mehboob Khan’s Hindi movie Mother India? Tightwad with an ugly face, bald head with Hindu sacred symbols Shikha & Tilak, big mustaches, dirty stares, rapacious character, who tries to rape a helpless mother of four small kids in exchange for food for her dying kids right in mid of storm? 

Sukhi ‘Baniya’ molesting a helpless mother of 4

This portrayal of Lala/Baniya was then adopted and taken to new heights by Salim-Javed (the same Javed who after villanizing the most peaceful Baniya community on earth using stolen plots from Hollywood is now feeling sad at growing Islamophobia). In almost every other movie written by the likes of Javed, 5 characters were often seen. A casteist Brahman who would not let a Dalit enjoy equal rights, a cruel Thakur/Rajput whipping poor people for fun or raping women, and a greedy Baniya who would snatch Sood/interest even from mother of dying kids.

There used to be another interesting character. A Rahim Chacha who would protect poor/Dalit from Thakur’s atrocities or adopt a Hindu daughter/sister without changing her faith would eventually die protecting someone from Thakur’s wrath.

Remember Shahrukh Khan’s Raees? Baniye ka dimaag aur Miya Bhai ki daring? This is a subtle way of putting Hindus as Baniya and Muslims as a martial race. Junior Owaisi’s open threat to wipe out 100 Crore Hindus with 25 Crore Miya Bhai was nothing but an exhibition of the universality of the 1:10 theorem aka Miya Bhai ki daring (check the number of social media ‘Miya Bhai’ pages endorsed/inspired by Owaisis).

This also explains why the Muslim community in general and Islamists, in particular, are victims of illiteracy, poor health, and worst statistics in scientific innovations. When applying Dimaag/brain is looked down upon in popular culture, having brains is a matter of ridicule and joke, and violent tendencies are glorified beyond limits, you end up becoming an Islamist circus-like Pakistan. 

These idiotic Baniya-Martial race fantasies would not merit a response if their impact could remain confined to some isolated Mullah brains. But given these reveries served as war strategies for Islamists in past (including terror attacks on India and 1948, 1965, and 1999 Ind-Pak conflicts), eyes can’t be closed. It’s not about how ridiculous Islamists are but how much capable these ridiculous Islamists are.

All Indians are not Hindus. All Hindus are not Baniyas. All Baniyas are not cowards. Muslims of Pakistan are children of those Hindus who had to change their faith at a sword’s point. At least 2/3rd of Pak Army Chiefs to date have been descendants of Hindu Jats and Rajputs. Rest 1/3rd have faked their castes. I will give a detailed account of all prominent Pakistanis and their Hindu ancestry in subsequent articles.

All Pakistanis carry Hindu DNA. If all Hindus are Baniyas, all Pakistanis are those children of Baniyas who couldn’t fight.

References:

vashisharma.com - Dr. Vashi Sharma, studied at IITB, taught at IITK, Energy Science, Defence, Religions, history, Pakistan