Skip to main content

Thursday, 21 November 2024 | 02:24 pm

|   Subscribe   |   donation   Support Us    |   donation

Log in
Register


Shri Nrisimha Anjaneya temple in Varadharajapuram near Chennai was declared as an encroachment a few weeks ago and a notice was issued to evacuate the land

Narasimha Anjaneyar temple demolished in Tamil Nadu despite devotees best efforts to save it, places of worship of other religions are spared

Hindu organizations have alleged that more than 150 temples have been demolished since DMK came to power and that no churches or mosques were touched as a part of the demolition drive can be safely asserted
 |  Satyaagrah  |  Temple

Yet another temple has been demolished in Tamil Nadu despite devotees' best efforts to save it. The Nrisimha Anjaneya temple near Chennai has been demolished on the allegations that it encroaches on the waterway of the Adyar river. However commercial establishments and residential complexes encroaching the same space have been left untouched. While temples are demolished with impunity, places of worship of other religions are spared.

Shri Nrisimha Anjaneya temple in Varadharajapuram near Chennai was declared as an encroachment a few weeks ago and a notice was issued to evacuate the land. However, devotees accused the government officials of issuing notice out of the blue and wanting to demolish the temple the next day itself. Devotees sat in protest inside the temple and refused to leave when the officials came the next day. Some even climbed the temple tower in protest and the officials had to leave as they didn’t have enough police with them to control the devotees.

They started an online campaign to protect the temple and the video of a female devotee, part of the temple management committee, crying about the situation went viral. She said the temple has been there for nearly 30 years and that in 2015, Amudha IAS, had checked out the temple and said that it doesn’t encroach the waterway. But corporation officials claim that it was declared as encroachment in 2015 as well and the structure was brought down. Even if that’s the truth, how could other buildings encroaching the waterway be spared and the temple selectively chosen for demolition, devotees question?

templeTN11JanP2

Mudichur, where the temple is located, has been bearing the brunt of encroachment on waterways and floodplains for a long time. In 2017, when the area flooded due to rains, residents accused the state government of inefficiency. The state highways department hadn’t completed the stormwater drains and even the ongoing work was allegedly poor, as the drain’s capacity was small. Residents allege that corporation officials are in cohorts with those who have encroached government land and blocked the flow of rainwater.

To give an insight into how badly water bodies have encroached, this Economic Times report quotes an environmental activist and professor as saying,  “The Porur lake’s original water spread area was 800 acres; now it is 100 acres or less. A lot of lands has been given to private parties. Land use patterns were changed and made legal for them. These are called legalized encroachments”. Another activist says, “even though there are 3,000 settlements in the Perungalathur lake with 10 houses per acre whereas the revenue records show only 100 settlements with 1 house per acre”.

The government, regardless of the party in power, lets people encroach on water bodies and waterways selfishly. But when it comes to removing them only temples are targeted while so-called “legalized encroachments” are left untouched. Hindu organizations have alleged that more than 150 temples have been demolished since DMK came to power. They accuse the government of demolishing temples on the pretext of removing encroachments in water bodies and waterways based on Madras HC’s order.

Last month the High Court had slammed government officials for helping a pastor evade eviction of his church which was encroaching a water body. The Tehsildar had told the court that the public didn’t object to the presence of the church and so there is no need for it to be demolished. The church was demolished only after the court came down heavily on the government for bias. 

templeTN11JanP1

On the same day, corporation officials encountered an Infant Jesus and Mary statue at the entrance of a bus stand in Chennai. The land was recovered from an individual who had encroached it. The bus stand is still being constructed and the statue was a hindrance to traffic. Corporation officials carefully removed the statue and placed it in the Tehsildar’s office. They have also promised an alternate land to install the statue.

While it is difficult to find out whether more than 150 temples were really demolished by the DMK government since May, that no churches or mosques were touched as a part of the demolition drive can be safely asserted. When Chennai flooded during the monsoon rains, a youngster had posted a video on social media about how the waterway adjoining her residential area had been encroached by a church, which despite being inspected many times still stands and blocks the rainwater flow.

References:

hindupost.in - By MahaKrishnan

Support Us


Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.

While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.

Satyaagrah Razorpay PayPal
 ICICI Bank of SatyaagrahRazorpay Bank of SatyaagrahPayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments

If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:

Pay Satyaagrah

Please share the article on other platforms

To Top

DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.


Related Articles