Skip to main content

Tuesday, 5 November 2024 | 12:11 pm

|   Subscribe   |   donation   Support Us    |   donation

Log in
Register


"Man versus dog: in this round of alimony Olympics, Fido takes the gold!": In an unprecedented ruling, Mumbai's court insists that man's best friend requires maintenance too, husband now legally obliged to pay estranged wife's canine companions' upkeep

Presiding over this curious case, Magistrate Komalsing Rajput took a moment to school everyone in the courtroom on the importance of pets in one's life
 |  Satyaagrah  |  Law
Mumbai court asks husband to pay maintenance for wife’s 3 pet dogs too, says the dogs “fulfill emotional deficit after a broken relationship”
Mumbai court asks husband to pay maintenance for wife’s 3 pet dogs too, says the dogs “fulfill emotional deficit after a broken relationship”

Step right up and hold onto your hats, folks, because today's tale from the courtrooms of Mumbai is going to have you scratching your heads and, hopefully, chuckling a bit, too. Let's set the stage: a matrimonial squabble, a stern judge, three Rottweilers, and a husband who, by the end of this story, might very well wish he were one of the dogs.

The scene unfolded on July 11, 2023, when a metropolitan magistrate in Bandra, Mumbai tossed out a husband's attempt to lower the maintenance amount payable to his wife. Yeah, you read that right, our poor chap was hoping to save a few rupees, but lo and behold, fate had something quite different in store for him.

You see, his wife wasn't just asking for the usual maintenance; she was also seeking funds to look after her trio of Rottweiler pups. The husband, probably choking on his morning tea, argued that puppy pampering didn't count as maintenance. Unfortunately for him, the court wasn't too impressed by his plea.

Presiding over this curious case, Magistrate Komalsing Rajput took a moment to school everyone in the courtroom on the importance of pets in one's life, especially when that life has been recently jolted by a failed marriage. Our man Rajput asserted that pets are more than just furry companions; they're essentially cuddly therapists who help folks recover from emotional earthquakes, like a broken marriage.

So, with that, the gavel came down, and the husband's attempt to wriggle out of the doggy maintenance was sent packing. The magistrate firmly pronounced that our man would have to cough up the funds for the Rottweilers, too.

Now let's rewind a bit. The wife, a 55-year-old woman represented by advocate Shweta Moray, had initially sought a monthly maintenance amount of ₹70,000, a figure that probably made our husband's heart skip a beat or two. Unfortunately for him, on June 20, the court, while not completely siding with the wife, did order the husband to pay ₹50,000 as interim maintenance.

The court arrived at this decision after a good look at the financial standing of both parties. Despite the husband's tales of business losses, there wasn't any substantial evidence to back up his claims. The court also pointed out that the wife, who was dealing with health issues and didn't have a steady income, needed the maintenance to maintain her lifestyle and meet her needs, including taking care of her three Rottweilers, who were depending on her.

The couple had tied the knot in 1986 and had two daughters who were now comfortably settled abroad. Differences cropped up in their relationship in 2021, and the wife alleged that her husband had shipped her off to Mumbai with promises of maintenance and basic necessities, promises that, according to her, he hadn't kept.

She also accused him of domestic violence during their time together. In his defense, the husband claimed to have made certain payments to her during the intervening period.

Having examined the documents and heard both sides, Magistrate Rajput concluded that the wife had presented a strong preliminary case of domestic violence against her husband, and therefore, was entitled to interim maintenance.

So, there you have it, folks. The latest development in the world of legal shenanigans, featuring a husband, an estranged wife, and three Rottweilers. This unusual tale from the Mumbai court is sure to keep tongues wagging for a while, as it highlights the importance of pets in filling the emotional void after a relationship ends. And it goes to show that when it comes to marriage, divorce, and pet dogs, it's a dog-eat-dog world out there!

Support Us


Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.

While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.

Satyaagrah Razorpay PayPal
 ICICI Bank of SatyaagrahRazorpay Bank of SatyaagrahPayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments

If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:

Pay Satyaagrah

Please share the article on other platforms

To Top

DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.


Related Articles