"Man versus dog: in this round of alimony Olympics, Fido takes the gold!": In an unprecedented ruling, Mumbai's court insists that man's best friend requires maintenance too, husband now legally obliged to pay estranged wife's canine companions' upkeep
Step right up and hold onto your hats, folks, because today's tale from the courtrooms of Mumbai is going to have you scratching your heads and, hopefully, chuckling a bit, too. Let's set the stage: a matrimonial squabble, a stern judge, three Rottweilers, and a husband who, by the end of this story, might very well wish he were one of the dogs.
The scene unfolded on July 11, 2023, when a metropolitan magistrate in Bandra, Mumbai tossed out a husband's attempt to lower the maintenance amount payable to his wife. Yeah, you read that right, our poor chap was hoping to save a few rupees, but lo and behold, fate had something quite different in store for him.
You see, his wife wasn't just asking for the usual maintenance; she was also seeking funds to look after her trio of Rottweiler pups. The husband, probably choking on his morning tea, argued that puppy pampering didn't count as maintenance. Unfortunately for him, the court wasn't too impressed by his plea.
Presiding over this curious case, Magistrate Komalsing Rajput took a moment to school everyone in the courtroom on the importance of pets in one's life, especially when that life has been recently jolted by a failed marriage. Our man Rajput asserted that pets are more than just furry companions; they're essentially cuddly therapists who help folks recover from emotional earthquakes, like a broken marriage.
So, with that, the gavel came down, and the husband's attempt to wriggle out of the doggy maintenance was sent packing. The magistrate firmly pronounced that our man would have to cough up the funds for the Rottweilers, too.
Now let's rewind a bit. The wife, a 55-year-old woman represented by advocate Shweta Moray, had initially sought a monthly maintenance amount of ₹70,000, a figure that probably made our husband's heart skip a beat or two. Unfortunately for him, on June 20, the court, while not completely siding with the wife, did order the husband to pay ₹50,000 as interim maintenance.
The court arrived at this decision after a good look at the financial standing of both parties. Despite the husband's tales of business losses, there wasn't any substantial evidence to back up his claims. The court also pointed out that the wife, who was dealing with health issues and didn't have a steady income, needed the maintenance to maintain her lifestyle and meet her needs, including taking care of her three Rottweilers, who were depending on her.
The couple had tied the knot in 1986 and had two daughters who were now comfortably settled abroad. Differences cropped up in their relationship in 2021, and the wife alleged that her husband had shipped her off to Mumbai with promises of maintenance and basic necessities, promises that, according to her, he hadn't kept.
She also accused him of domestic violence during their time together. In his defense, the husband claimed to have made certain payments to her during the intervening period.
Having examined the documents and heard both sides, Magistrate Rajput concluded that the wife had presented a strong preliminary case of domestic violence against her husband, and therefore, was entitled to interim maintenance.
So, there you have it, folks. The latest development in the world of legal shenanigans, featuring a husband, an estranged wife, and three Rottweilers. This unusual tale from the Mumbai court is sure to keep tongues wagging for a while, as it highlights the importance of pets in filling the emotional void after a relationship ends. And it goes to show that when it comes to marriage, divorce, and pet dogs, it's a dog-eat-dog world out there!
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- Husband submitted that his wife living separately for 10 years, she implicated false 498-A IPC, in which he was acquitted, and prayed for divorce on ground of mental cruelty: Court concurred disputes not serious
- "प्यार तूने क्या किया": In Kolkata, 36-year-old divorcee Sanghati Paul stabs 30-year-old Sarthak Das, her live-in partner, multiple times, Das treated her son as his own, Paul confessed to the crime, igniting a city-wide debate on hidden feminism dangers
- Gender Biased Indian Law: Delhi High Court observed that in India, expenditure borne by brother in supporting his divorced sister must be taken into account while passing an order of maintenance in favour of his wife
- "In the pursuit of justice, let's not forget the essence of the law": Section 498A IPC, enacted to protect married women from cruelty, is now being misused. This misuse disrupts familial harmony and undermines genuine cases, warns Jharkhand High Court
- "Excessively harsh": Centre opposes criminalizing marital rape, citing existing laws like Sections 354, 354A, 354B, 498A IPC, and the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, already offer serious penal consequences for violations of consent within marriage
- “A bench of Justices chosen through collegium got to choose to decide who has the better lawyer”: Karnataka government supports High Court verdict upholding marital rape charges against husband which is another stark violation of human rights
- “Life is a matter of choices, and every choice you make makes you”: In a historic judgment, Supreme Court declared that unmarried women are entitled to terminate pregnancies of 20-24 weeks from consensual relationships on International Safe Abortion day
- Due To Contract Marriage Fraud 3600 Punjab Men Have Been Duped Of Rs 150 Crore In Last 5-Years: An extremely worrying trend where Men are cheated, looted and dumped by local women
- "Of course, his fault; how could he refuse": Pune woman Renuka punches husband Nikhil Khanna to death for not taking her to Dubai for her birthday, even gifts he brought on her anniversary were not satisfactory, police claims her to be intoxicated
- "We are all born gifted. That is our true inheritance": Supreme Court observes that female tribal is entitled to parity with male tribal in intestate succession, says "Not to grant benefit of 'Survivorship to daughter in father's property' is bad Law"