"You cannot deny guilt, and thereby you allow the Curse to be your due": Lower court grants Divorce to husband after 19-years for 20-day marriage, Wife challenges order in High Court, not exceptional case as our courts are flooded with endless litigations
Divorce rate in India is just about 1%. Surely, that doesn’t mean all other couples are living in paradise. If one accounts for the number of couples officially separated in India without a legal divorce, the revelation can be beyond shocking.
|
Are Family Courts Battleground To Settle Egos?
A couple who was married for just 20 days, was granted a divorce after 20 years of a court battle. Don’t be shocked because these are not exceptional cases and our courts are flooded with these endless litigations.
Commenting on the slow justice delivery system in India, Dharmesh Sharma, the principal judge of the family court in Delhi said,
It casts a very sickening feeling in my mind.
The judge blamed both the parties as well as their lawyers, however, attributed the delay to the legal system in our country which has been overburdened at every front. The civil, as well as criminal courts in India, have millions of cases pending, and this case proves that we are in no way close to the idea of fast-track courts.
Case:
53-year-old Thirumoorthy Ramakrishnan and 49-year-old Subhashini Bala Subramanian got married in 1998. However, the couple separated after 20 days of their married life together – after the wife got arrested in a case of fraud – that she maintained she was wrongly accused of.
Husband filed for divorce on grounds of ‘cruelty’ after suffering immense stress on learning of his wife’s fraud case. The wife was arrested from Ooty, where the newlywed couple had gone to visit temples.
Wife’s Clarification
The wife accused her husband of ‘abandoning’ her and leaving her to fend for herself and their daughter on her own. Incidentally, it was on the last day of her remand after she was brought to Delhi for her trial, when she told her husband that she was carrying their child.
Husband’s Side
The man moved court, seeking dissolution of marriage on the grounds that following the arrest of his wife, he was interrogated by the police on a number of occasions. As a part of the legal battle that ensued, enquiries made at the workplace of the husband which resulted in ‘deep mental and physical cruelty’ for him. Apparently, he also told the court that the woman kept her professional qualifications and other essential details hidden from him, only aggravating his tension.
Delhi Court
The court granted divorce in the year 2017, saying that the arrest, detention and criminal prosecution of the wife, whether innocent or not of the charges, so early into their marriage caused the husband exceptional hardship and was inflicted with intolerable mental cruelty. Judge Sharma quoted:
Unfortunate as it may look, this case is coming up for the final decision after nineteen years of its institution initially before the family court. The most unfortunate aspect of this case is that the parties cohabited hardly for about 20 days before calamity struck the newly married bride, having pernicious repercussions on the mindset of her husband. The marriage has irretrievably broken down despite the fact the parties are quite educated and hail from an affluent class of society, and I only wish they should have settled their differences in an amicable manner instead of suffering the agony of protracted matrimonial litigation.
Thirumoorthy Ramakrishnan’s advocate Saurabh Chauhan said that if the case had been sorted in a normal time span of 1-2 years, he would have re-married. However, the delay in decisions from the court has left everyone in a very tough situation. Chauhan quoted:
Protracted legal battles in our system end up spoiling a person’s life. A marriage going bad is an accident. It can happen to anyone.
Year 2017
The man has reportedly shifted abroad, while his ex-wife works as an accountant here. Their daughter passed Class 12 with 94 percent.
Matter Not Over
Anil Sharma, counsel for the wife, told that they have moved the high court in appeal. Speaking back in 2017 to India Today, he said,
The charges leveled by the husband on my client also amount to cruelty. The husband abandoned the wife and daughter when they required him the most. He also never took care of the daughter’s expenses. The woman has brought up the girl singlehandedly.
MDO Take:
One of the main reasons, for couples being trapped in loveless and unhappy marriages in India, is the absolute failure of family courts to deliver justice or verdict within a stipulated time. Often contested divorces may take a minimum of two decades to reach Supreme Court, by when the couples have grown old and have very less opportunity to rebuild their personal life again. While the judiciary often blames this on the unimaginable number of cases per judge at each level, there has been no change in redundant 20th Century laws whatsoever. There were many hopes from the Modi government, however, we have failed to see any action on this front in the past 7-years of governance.
References:
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- "To reopen old wounds is to seek healing, not hurt": 34 years past the assassination of Judge Neelkanth Ganjoo for fulfilling his duty still echoes in Jammu and Kashmir, as the SIA reopens this chapter, we are reminded that justice always finds its way
- Justice Gaurang Kanth who took oath as judge of the Calcutta High Court this morning, his letter surfaced recently where he was seeking suspension of police officers who failed to keep the door of his residence locked resulting in the loss of his pet dog
- "Truth is often stranger than fiction": Imagine finding a Shivling in every mosque's fountain!" Maulana Tauqeer Raza muses, stoking controversy over the Gyanvapi structure. Is it truth or clever wordplay? History meets sarcasm in this religious saga
- "Faith in judiciary has eroded considerably, need to find out what went wrong": Justice Oka reveals a stark truth that faith in judiciary wrecked, highlighting lower courts' struggles & the CJI's recent admission of mediocrity, calling for urgent reforms
- "As per Article 195 from the book ‘Principles of Mohammedan Law’ by Sir Dinshah Fardunji Mulla, Muslim girl above 16 is competent to marry any person of choice": Punjab and Haryana HC cites Sharia to justify child marriage
- "कृष्णलला हम आयेंगे": Allahabad High Court delivers a historic verdict favoring Hindu devotees in the Krishna Janmabhoomi case, dismissing the Muslim side’s plea and affirming the legal standing of Hindu claims under key acts, marking a judicial milestone
- "Honest conviction is my courage; the Constitution is my guide": VP Jagdeep Dhankar took exception to Courts quashing changes made by parliament to the Constitution, says "Nowhere in the world Constitutional provisions are undone by courts like in India"
- "What a sad era when it is easier to smash an atom than a prejudice": Supreme Court declines to entertain PIL for creation of National Commission for Men to look into suicides among married men, says "No question of misplaced sympathy for anyone"
- "A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both": Delhi High Court upheld the freedom of speech privilege of the advocacy profession, Justice Mini Pushkarna even refused to look into irrelevance or maliciousness of the statement
- In a defining moment, India's Supreme Court declined to recognize same-sex marriage rights, placing the onus on Parliament, amidst passionate pleas & dissenting opinions, future of LGBTQ+ unions remains in legislative hands, echoing society's crossroads