"Judge saheb ko bura laga kya… nahi, bas yunhi pooch riya hun": CJI Ramana slams Indian media amid the backlash judiciary is facing over controversial remarks and judgements, says ‘Media running agenda-driven debates and kangaroo courts’
Amid the backlash, the judiciary is dealing with in current weeks over debatable comments and judgments, specifically over oral remarks in opposition to Nupur Sharma, the chief justice of India today launched an assault on Indian media during a speech.
The CJI alleged that the media is developing problems for the judiciary and harming democracy. He expressed worries about the “concerted campaigns” in media and social media towards judges, and debates on media on instances heard via way of means of the courts calling them “ill-knowledgeable and agenda pushed.” Chief Justice of India N V Ramana made those comments on Saturday at a public lecture at the National University of Study & Research in Law, Ranchi. In his speech, CJI N V Ramana mentioned the problems confronting the modern judiciary and slammed the media agencies for allegedly strolling Kangaroo Courts.
“Of late, we see media strolling kangaroo courts, at instances on issues even experienced judges find difficult to decide”, he stated whilst addressing an occasion at the National University of Study and Research in Law in Ranchi. He additionally said that some of the media corporations have been ill-knowledgeable and drove agenda-pushed debates on problems related to justice delivery. “Biased perspectives being propagated via way of means of media are affecting the people, weakening democracy, and harming the system. In this process, justice delivery gets adversely affected. This act of the media is proving to be unfavorable to the fitness of democracy”, he stated.
|
He proceeded to say that the media was subverting a majority rules system by surpassing and disregarding their commitments. "There is still some responsibility on paper media." Electronic media, then again, has no liability since what it presents vanishes immediately and inexplicably. "More regrettable is virtual entertainment," the CJI guaranteed.
He added that it would be the best practice if the media could self-manage and quantify its words. The CJI likewise implied that the media had taken on the propensity for meddling in Court choices and government rehearses. "You shouldn't violate and welcome obstruction, either from the public authority or from the courts. Judges may not respond right away. Kindly don't botch it to be a shortcoming or powerlessness. At the point when freedoms are practiced mindfully, inside their spaces, there will be no need of setting sensible or proportionate outside limitations," CJI Ramana was cited.
In the meantime, Justice Ramana additionally made referenced the expansion in the actual assaults on judges. "Nowadays, we are seeing a rising number of actual assaults on judges… Judges need to live in the very society as individuals that they have sentenced, with practically no security or affirmation of security", he said. He squeezed that the adjudicators were being dealt with independently from lawmakers, officials, cops, and other public delegates.
|
The CJI further expressed that the most troublesome assignment facing the present court was 'focusing on issues for settlement'. "The courts can't easily overlook financial reality." To save the framework from unnecessary debates and challenges, the appointed authority should focus on significant worries". The Chief Justice proceeded to say that the significant reasons for the nation's case overabundance were the inability to fill legal opportunities and the inability to further develop a foundation.
"I will not neglect to put on record my stresses over the fate of legal executive in this country… The weight of an all-around delicate legal framework is expanding continuously. There have been a couple of automatic responses to expanding the foundation… However, I haven't known about any substantial arrangement to prepare the legal executive to address the difficulties of the not-so-distant future, let be a drawn-out vision for the hundred years to come… It is just with the organized endeavors by the legal executive and the chief that this disturbing issue of the framework can be tended to," he said closing his location at the National University of Study and Research in Law in Jharkhand's Ranchi.
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- "Can omnibus orders be passed against demolitions": Supreme Court asks in Jamiat pleas challenging "Bulldozer" actions against anti-social elements in Uttar Pradesh and other states, refuses to pass interim orders, next hearing on Aug 10
- "It is only the cynicism that is born of success that is penetrating and valid": A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petitions challenging the Central government's 2016 decision to demonetise currency notes of ₹1,000 and ₹500
- "It is not titles that honor men, but men that honor titles": CJI DY Chandrachud lamented, "Hundreds of young people die in India due to honour killings merely because they love someone or marry outside their caste or against their family's wishes"
- "Abuse is the weapon of the vulgar": Supreme Court to hear PIL for constitution of National Commission for Men, in total of 1,18,979 men suicide in the given year accounted 72% of the total suicide cases whereas women suicide represented roughly 27% only
- "Access is vital in lobbying. If you can't get in your door, you can't make your case": CJI Chandrachud removed justice MR Shah from the bench hearing forced conversion for not succumbing to lobby's pressure, was scheduled for Feb, now listed on Jan 16
- "We are all born gifted. That is our true inheritance": Supreme Court observes that female tribal is entitled to parity with male tribal in intestate succession, says "Not to grant benefit of 'Survivorship to daughter in father's property' is bad Law"
- Due to high public interest, the Law Commission has extended the Uniform Civil Code feedback deadline by two weeks, meanwhile, AIUDF leader Badruddin Ajmal misinterpreted the UCC, linking it to uniform attire and diet commenting 'sarees-for-all'
- "अल्हम्दुलिल्लाह!!! Mob has no religion": The Rajasthan High Court grants bail to 18 Islamists accused in the Hindu Shobha Yatra attack in Chittorgarh, highlighting the challenges of pinpointing culprits amidst the chaos of mob-induced communal violence
- “Judgment does not necessarily relate to the judiciary system”: “There is a limit to criticizing judges. Give us a break” laments Justice Chandrachud, but in Nupur case emotions of judges were so extensive that it “diluted the beheading in Udaipur”
- In a defining moment, India's Supreme Court declined to recognize same-sex marriage rights, placing the onus on Parliament, amidst passionate pleas & dissenting opinions, future of LGBTQ+ unions remains in legislative hands, echoing society's crossroads