"Judge saheb ko bura laga kya… nahi, bas yunhi pooch riya hun": CJI Ramana slams Indian media amid the backlash judiciary is facing over controversial remarks and judgements, says ‘Media running agenda-driven debates and kangaroo courts’
Amid the backlash, the judiciary is dealing with in current weeks over debatable comments and judgments, specifically over oral remarks in opposition to Nupur Sharma, the chief justice of India today launched an assault on Indian media during a speech.
The CJI alleged that the media is developing problems for the judiciary and harming democracy. He expressed worries about the “concerted campaigns” in media and social media towards judges, and debates on media on instances heard via way of means of the courts calling them “ill-knowledgeable and agenda pushed.” Chief Justice of India N V Ramana made those comments on Saturday at a public lecture at the National University of Study & Research in Law, Ranchi. In his speech, CJI N V Ramana mentioned the problems confronting the modern judiciary and slammed the media agencies for allegedly strolling Kangaroo Courts.
“Of late, we see media strolling kangaroo courts, at instances on issues even experienced judges find difficult to decide”, he stated whilst addressing an occasion at the National University of Study and Research in Law in Ranchi. He additionally said that some of the media corporations have been ill-knowledgeable and drove agenda-pushed debates on problems related to justice delivery. “Biased perspectives being propagated via way of means of media are affecting the people, weakening democracy, and harming the system. In this process, justice delivery gets adversely affected. This act of the media is proving to be unfavorable to the fitness of democracy”, he stated.
|
He proceeded to say that the media was subverting a majority rules system by surpassing and disregarding their commitments. "There is still some responsibility on paper media." Electronic media, then again, has no liability since what it presents vanishes immediately and inexplicably. "More regrettable is virtual entertainment," the CJI guaranteed.
He added that it would be the best practice if the media could self-manage and quantify its words. The CJI likewise implied that the media had taken on the propensity for meddling in Court choices and government rehearses. "You shouldn't violate and welcome obstruction, either from the public authority or from the courts. Judges may not respond right away. Kindly don't botch it to be a shortcoming or powerlessness. At the point when freedoms are practiced mindfully, inside their spaces, there will be no need of setting sensible or proportionate outside limitations," CJI Ramana was cited.
In the meantime, Justice Ramana additionally made referenced the expansion in the actual assaults on judges. "Nowadays, we are seeing a rising number of actual assaults on judges… Judges need to live in the very society as individuals that they have sentenced, with practically no security or affirmation of security", he said. He squeezed that the adjudicators were being dealt with independently from lawmakers, officials, cops, and other public delegates.
|
The CJI further expressed that the most troublesome assignment facing the present court was 'focusing on issues for settlement'. "The courts can't easily overlook financial reality." To save the framework from unnecessary debates and challenges, the appointed authority should focus on significant worries". The Chief Justice proceeded to say that the significant reasons for the nation's case overabundance were the inability to fill legal opportunities and the inability to further develop a foundation.
"I will not neglect to put on record my stresses over the fate of legal executive in this country… The weight of an all-around delicate legal framework is expanding continuously. There have been a couple of automatic responses to expanding the foundation… However, I haven't known about any substantial arrangement to prepare the legal executive to address the difficulties of the not-so-distant future, let be a drawn-out vision for the hundred years to come… It is just with the organized endeavors by the legal executive and the chief that this disturbing issue of the framework can be tended to," he said closing his location at the National University of Study and Research in Law in Jharkhand's Ranchi.
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- “Chaos is merely order waiting to be deciphered”: MoP issue settled; government cannot conveniently cite views of few judges on MoP to oppose Collegium recommendations, scheme of our constitution requires court to be final arbiter of law ~ Supreme Court
- "Faith in judiciary has eroded considerably, need to find out what went wrong": Justice Oka reveals a stark truth that faith in judiciary wrecked, highlighting lower courts' struggles & the CJI's recent admission of mediocrity, calling for urgent reforms
- "गुस्ताख़ी-ए-फ़रिश्ता": Delhi High Court dismisses Waqf Board's plea against Sunehri Bagh Mosque's demolition, led by chairman of the Delhi Waqf Board, Amanatullah Khan; NDMC seeks public insights, inviting suggestions and objections
- "Order Order बाद में, पहले exam की तैयारी करो": President Murmu champions the All India Judicial Service, aiming to revolutionize judicial recruitment across states, akin to UPSC's nationwide approach – a transformative stride in India's legal landscape
- Uphaar Cinema fire was one of the worst fire tragedies in recent Indian history: Association of Victims of Uphaar Fire Tragedy (AVUT) filed a landmark case considered a breakthrough in civil compensation law in India
- "और कितना ही खुले कर बोले कोई": Justice Kaul, 'Weak opposition is a problem; court cannot handle the govt or act as opposition,' urges legal impact studies, acknowledging, 'We are a very divided society...traversing that middle path has become difficult'
- "Access is vital in lobbying. If you can't get in your door, you can't make your case": CJI Chandrachud removed justice MR Shah from the bench hearing forced conversion for not succumbing to lobby's pressure, was scheduled for Feb, now listed on Jan 16
- No evidence to tie Dinesh Yadav to violence, intention assumed based on him being Hindu: Anti-Hindu riots by Muslim community that shook the capital city of India and analysis of the conviction
- "अब आयो ऊंट पहाड़ नीचे": A Bareilly court convicts Mohammed Alim for Love Jihad, tricking a woman into conversion and abortion, giving him life in prison, penalizing his father, and warning of conversion threats like in Pakistan and Bangladesh
- "कृष्णलला हम आयेंगे": Allahabad High Court delivers a historic verdict favoring Hindu devotees in the Krishna Janmabhoomi case, dismissing the Muslim side’s plea and affirming the legal standing of Hindu claims under key acts, marking a judicial milestone