"Judge saheb ko bura laga kya… nahi, bas yunhi pooch riya hun": CJI Ramana slams Indian media amid the backlash judiciary is facing over controversial remarks and judgements, says ‘Media running agenda-driven debates and kangaroo courts’

Amid the backlash, the judiciary is dealing with in current weeks over debatable comments and judgments, specifically over oral remarks in opposition to Nupur Sharma, the chief justice of India today launched an assault on Indian media during a speech.
The CJI alleged that the media is developing problems for the judiciary and harming democracy. He expressed worries about the “concerted campaigns” in media and social media towards judges, and debates on media on instances heard via way of means of the courts calling them “ill-knowledgeable and agenda pushed.” Chief Justice of India N V Ramana made those comments on Saturday at a public lecture at the National University of Study & Research in Law, Ranchi. In his speech, CJI N V Ramana mentioned the problems confronting the modern judiciary and slammed the media agencies for allegedly strolling Kangaroo Courts.
“Of late, we see media strolling kangaroo courts, at instances on issues even experienced judges find difficult to decide”, he stated whilst addressing an occasion at the National University of Study and Research in Law in Ranchi. He additionally said that some of the media corporations have been ill-knowledgeable and drove agenda-pushed debates on problems related to justice delivery. “Biased perspectives being propagated via way of means of media are affecting the people, weakening democracy, and harming the system. In this process, justice delivery gets adversely affected. This act of the media is proving to be unfavorable to the fitness of democracy”, he stated.
|
He proceeded to say that the media was subverting a majority rules system by surpassing and disregarding their commitments. "There is still some responsibility on paper media." Electronic media, then again, has no liability since what it presents vanishes immediately and inexplicably. "More regrettable is virtual entertainment," the CJI guaranteed.
He added that it would be the best practice if the media could self-manage and quantify its words. The CJI likewise implied that the media had taken on the propensity for meddling in Court choices and government rehearses. "You shouldn't violate and welcome obstruction, either from the public authority or from the courts. Judges may not respond right away. Kindly don't botch it to be a shortcoming or powerlessness. At the point when freedoms are practiced mindfully, inside their spaces, there will be no need of setting sensible or proportionate outside limitations," CJI Ramana was cited.
In the meantime, Justice Ramana additionally made referenced the expansion in the actual assaults on judges. "Nowadays, we are seeing a rising number of actual assaults on judges… Judges need to live in the very society as individuals that they have sentenced, with practically no security or affirmation of security", he said. He squeezed that the adjudicators were being dealt with independently from lawmakers, officials, cops, and other public delegates.
|
The CJI further expressed that the most troublesome assignment facing the present court was 'focusing on issues for settlement'. "The courts can't easily overlook financial reality." To save the framework from unnecessary debates and challenges, the appointed authority should focus on significant worries". The Chief Justice proceeded to say that the significant reasons for the nation's case overabundance were the inability to fill legal opportunities and the inability to further develop a foundation.
"I will not neglect to put on record my stresses over the fate of legal executive in this country… The weight of an all-around delicate legal framework is expanding continuously. There have been a couple of automatic responses to expanding the foundation… However, I haven't known about any substantial arrangement to prepare the legal executive to address the difficulties of the not-so-distant future, let be a drawn-out vision for the hundred years to come… It is just with the organized endeavors by the legal executive and the chief that this disturbing issue of the framework can be tended to," he said closing his location at the National University of Study and Research in Law in Jharkhand's Ranchi.
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at satyaagrahindia@gmail.com and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- "Honest conviction is my courage; the Constitution is my guide": VP Jagdeep Dhankar took exception to Courts quashing changes made by parliament to the Constitution, says "Nowhere in the world Constitutional provisions are undone by courts like in India"
- "Law is not law, if it violates principles of eternal justice": Justice DY Chandrachud is set to become India’s 50th CJI, a judge known for his often liberal and dissenting views has been part of some landmark verdicts of Ayodhya, Section 377 & Sabrimala
- "Truth is often stranger than fiction": Imagine finding a Shivling in every mosque's fountain!" Maulana Tauqeer Raza muses, stoking controversy over the Gyanvapi structure. Is it truth or clever wordplay? History meets sarcasm in this religious saga
- “Judgment does not necessarily relate to the judiciary system”: “There is a limit to criticizing judges. Give us a break” laments Justice Chandrachud, but in Nupur case emotions of judges were so extensive that it “diluted the beheading in Udaipur”
- 5 lakh kg of temple jewellery has been melted so far, DMK government planning to melt even more
- "ॐ त्र्यम्बकं यजामहे सुगन्धिं पुष्टिवर्धनम्": In a Historic win for Hindus, Allahabad HC upholds right to worship at Gyanvapi, dismisses all Muslim petitions, Court orders swift 6-month decision, ASI can survey any part of plot number 9130 (Gyanvapi site)
- "चलो फिर से": Baba Ramdev claims "crores of people are dying" from toxic modern medicines, comparing their deadly impact to British rule, Islamic invasions, and revolutions by Lenin, Marx, and Mao, despite Supreme Court warnings against fearmongering
- ‘HRCE Department is bound to protect temple properties and their belongings’: Madras HC lashes out at Tamil Nadu govt, orders to initiate proceedings to recover the encroached temple land, warns strong action
- Husband submitted that his wife living separately for 10 years, she implicated false 498-A IPC, in which he was acquitted, and prayed for divorce on ground of mental cruelty: Court concurred disputes not serious
- "Action speaks louder than words": Amidst rising tension in Manipur, the Supreme Court steps in, forming an all-women judicial committee to ensure justice. While incidents in other states might be overlooked, Manipur won't be left in the shadows
- Why Hindus not claiming their temples back from the Government control: Is pro-Hindu govt will always be in power
- "There is difference between blasphemy and expressing religious opinions based on one’s knowledge of the subject": Historic decision by Madras High Court from 2019
- "कृष्णलला हम आयेंगे": Allahabad High Court delivers a historic verdict favoring Hindu devotees in the Krishna Janmabhoomi case, dismissing the Muslim side’s plea and affirming the legal standing of Hindu claims under key acts, marking a judicial milestone
- Only Dhimmis can be a good Hindu – An article on Shekhar Gupta’s ThePrint argues ‘defending namaz’
- "Man is not what he thinks he is, he is what he hides": Supreme Court rejects plea seeking details of December 12, 2018, Collegium meeting held, "Whatever is discussed shall not be in the public domain. Only final decision required to be uploaded"