In a recent twist to the Love Jihad case that has stirred controversy in Kerala, Hadiya, a Muslim girl who converted from Hinduism and received support from the banned organization PFI, has entered into a second marriage discreetly. Hadiya's father, Ashokan, claims that his daughter informed him a few weeks ago about her "secretive marriage" to Khalid Dastagir, following her divorce from Shafin Jehan, who had sought the Supreme Court's approval to marry Hadiya.

Originally named Akhila, Hadiya was studying Homeopathy when she was drawn to Islam in 2015. Concerned about his daughter's conversion, Ashokan took the matter to authorities, accusing her friends from the Islamic faith and A S Zainaba, the head of the Popular Front of India's (PFI) women's wing.

To shield Hadiya from potential legal issues, the PFI orchestrated her marriage to Shafin Jehan. However, the Kerala High Court intervened and annulled the marriage in 2016, citing numerous violations of Islamic traditions.

Now, Hadiya's father has moved the High Court, expressing apprehensions about his daughter's whereabouts. This development raises questions about the complexity of personal choices, religious affiliations, and legal interventions in the ever-evolving landscape of India's cultural fabric. The story of Hadiya unfolds as a blend of familial concerns, religious transformations, and the judicial system's scrutiny.

In March 2018, the Supreme Court granted approval for Hadiya and Shafin Jehan's marriage after hearing her side of the story. The legal proceedings saw the involvement of prominent lawyers, with the PFI securing the services of senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Indira Jaisingh. However, subsequent investigations by the Enforcement Directorate into PFI's financial dealings revealed that Kapil Sibal received a substantial fee of Rs.75 lakh, while Indira Jaisingh was paid Rs.5 lakh.

Hadiya's father, Ashokan, had raised concerns the previous year about the scrutiny his family faced when visiting Hadiya in the Malappuram area. He shared, "Her clinic was surrounded by a lot of people from the PFI cadre, and my daughter seemed restricted in her communication, appearing fearful." These assertions highlight the tense atmosphere surrounding Hadiya's life during that period.

Ashokan further expressed his lack of information about Shafin Jehan's whereabouts for an extended period. "Now through some friends in the media," he disclosed, "I came to know she separated from Shafin and married one Khalid Dastagir in July." Astonishingly, Ashokan revealed that even the divorce procedures, conducted according to Islamic traditions, were unknown to him. In August, he initiated contact with Hadiya, who confirmed her remarriage but chose not to divulge details about her new husband.

Ashokan, Hadiya's father, sheds light on the secretive nature surrounding his daughter's marriages. "When I was talking, his mother (Khalid Dastagir) also came online and confirmed the second marriage. But they did not share any details. Said he is working as a GM. That is all. No further details like the GM of which company," he revealed. The lack of specific information about Khalid Dastagir's professional details adds to the mystery surrounding Hadiya's current marital status.

Furthermore, Ashokan expressed the strain in his relationship with Hadiya and her new family, stating, "She was angry with me for talking to the media about her secret second marriage." This tension highlights the complexity of family dynamics intertwined with the legal and personal aspects of Hadiya's life.

Ashokan is actively exploring legal options to address the situation. His concern goes beyond the complexities of his daughter's marriages. He alleges that Hadiya might have been taken into illegal custody by individuals associated with the banned Popular Front of India, including her former husband, Shafin Jahan. These serious allegations escalate the situation, adding layers of legal intricacies and potential threats to Hadiya's well-being.

The legal drama surrounding Hadiya takes another turn as Asokan, her father, files a plea, expressing his concerns about her well-being. "The plea is expected to be heard on Tuesday," states a lawyer connected to the case, underscoring the urgency of the situation.

In the plea, Asokan informs the court about the challenges in reaching Hadiya. "Despite their efforts, Hadiya has been unreachable, with her phone often switched off or unanswered," he asserts. This revelation raises questions about the transparency of communication between Hadiya and her family, adding an element of mystery to her current situation.

Asokan goes on to detail the family's attempt to locate Hadiya at her recently opened homeopathic clinic in Malappuram. "It was closed, and neighbors were unaware of her whereabouts," he mentions. This lack of information from her immediate surroundings deepens the concern for Hadiya's safety and adds to the complexity of the ongoing legal battle.

The legal petition filed by Asokan, Hadiya's father, takes a grave turn as it "raises concerns about potential harm to Hadiya." The petition suggests that individuals associated with the banned organization PFI may pose a threat to Hadiya's safety, intensifying the urgency of the matter.

The petition names key respondents, highlighting the gravity of the situation. "The fourth respondent in the petition is A S Sainaba, a former office-bearer of the National Women's Front, the women's wing of the banned PFI, and the sixth respondent is Hadiya's husband, Jahan." This legal move underscores the complexities involving not only Hadiya but also individuals associated with the banned organization, setting the stage for a high-stakes legal confrontation.

Asokan further adds to the unfolding drama by asserting that Hadiya had informed the family about her separation from her husband. However, a recent twist comes to light as "Hadiya, in a recent interview, claimed to have married someone else and accused her father of being influenced by the Sangh Parivar."

Hadiya's case gained attention when she converted to Islam during her medical studies and married Jahan in 2016. This pivotal moment in Hadiya's life sparked public interest, marking the beginning of a complex journey involving matters of faith, marriage, and legal intricacies.

Her father filed a petition alleging forced conversion and ties between Jahan and extremist organizations, leading to the annulment of the marriage by the high court. He played a central role in the legal battle, expressing concerns about his daughter's well-being and raising allegations of forced conversion. The court's decision to annul the marriage added a layer of complexity to an already contentious situation.

In 2018, the Supreme Court intervened, overturning the high court's decision and allowing Hadiya and Jahan to continue their marriage. This turn of events highlighted the legal complexities and differing perspectives surrounding Hadiya's life choices.

Like in the first marriage, her father K M Ashokan approached the High Court of Kerala with a habeas corpus petition saying Dr. Hadiya has been missing for the past two months. The current situation echoes the past, as Hadiya's father once again seeks legal intervention, expressing concerns about her well-being and alleging that she has been missing for an extended period.

Dr. Hadiya (formerly Akhila Ashoka) has lashed out at her father accusing him of 'playing the dirty games of the RSS'. The ongoing saga takes a contentious turn as Hadiya accuses her father of aligning with the RSS, a right-wing organization. This accusation adds a political dimension to the family conflict, raising questions about the influences at play in Hadiya's life.

Ashokan dismissed her statement. 'Let her say what she has to say in court,' he told Onmanorama. 'She is my daughter, and all I want for her is to stay safe and alive. That's all,' he said." Hadiya's father, Ashokan, responds to her accusations by urging her to present her side in court. 

"Those who are talking of parents' feelings should understand one thing, I am being crucified for a long time," she told Onmanorama.

Dr. Hadiya said her father came to her clinic one year ago. 'That day, I was out shopping. Won't I have my own needs, requirements, and engagements?' she said.

Her father Ashokan had said that he approached the High Court after not finding her in the clinic on December 3 and because she went incommunicado. 'Whatever he has said is a lie. My father and I were always in contact over the phone. I stopped attending his and my mother's phone calls after he played this dirty game. Two days ago, I attended my mother's call and told her that I was not interested in speaking with her because I lost trust in them,' she said.

On herremarriage, she said it need not be a topic of public discussion. "Our Constitution allows us to get divorced and remarry. It normally happens in society. I want to ask why everybody gets irritated when I do it. I want to ask the same of my parents?" she toldMediaOne.

Habeas corpus writ is a protection against illegal andarbitrary detention of a person. When pressed why he reported her to be missing when she was accessible over the phone,Ashokan said, "There is no need to go there as of now... None of this would have happened if she had called and told us her whereabouts," he said. "Did she not mislead the court by producing a person as her husband? Now she has divorced him and is getting ready to marry another person. I don't understand what her intention is. Do they have any plan to trigger a blast and unleash terrorism? We have a lot of doubts," he said.Ashokan said her daughter could come clean in thecourt of law.