In a troubling turn of events, anger has boiled over in the varsities of Kashmir, particularly at Amar Singh and Islamia Colleges in Srinagar, sparked by derogatory remarks attributed to a non-local student from NOT Srinagar against Prophet Muhammad. The incident, which follows protests at Srinagar's National Institute of Technology the previous day, has escalated tensions, prompting demonstrations at other colleges.

The heart of the unrest lies in the alleged social media post on the Prophet by a student hailing from outside Kashmir, an incident that has become a focal point of discontent in the region. The protests at Amar Singh and Islamia Colleges signify the spreading ripple effect of the initial unrest at the National Institute of Technology in Srinagar.

As the situation intensifies, the police have officially acknowledged the incident, emphasizing that they have taken cognizance of the uploading of sensitive content against religious sentiments, particularly aimed at a specific community. The action follows information received from NIT authorities, underscoring the seriousness with which the law enforcement is approaching the matter.

The protests and the police response lay the groundwork for a narrative that delves into the underlying tensions, the sentiments of the student community, and the authorities' stance on maintaining order and addressing sensitive issues. The subsequent sections will explore the unfolding events in greater detail, maintaining the gravity of the subject matter while adhering to the established guidelines.

In a startling development, Case FIR No. 156/23 u/s 295A, 153A, 153 IPC has been registered in PS Nigeen, stemming from an incident at the Srinagar National Institute of Technology (NIT). A Hindu student named Prathmesh finds himself at the center of a controversy, accused of blasphemy over an old video he shared on Prophet Muhammad, leading to a surge of 'Sar Tan Se Juda' threats from Islamists.

The alleged blasphemy incident unfolded on Tuesday when Prathmesh shared a video featuring Mosab Hassan Yousef, the son of the former Hamas chief, criticizing Prophet Muhammad, on his Instagram story. The FIR against Prathmesh was filed after a massive protest erupted at the NIT campus, accompanied by fervent sloganeering in response to the contentious video.

It's crucial to note that Prathmesh did not create the video; he merely shared an already viral clip edited by a YouTuber. Despite this, the Muslim students at NIT Srinagar vehemently demanded his arrest, accusing him of blasphemy. The situation raises questions about the complexities of freedom of expression, religious sensitivities, and the repercussions faced by individuals caught in the crossfire of such controversies.

The FIR and the ensuing threats underscore the gravity of the situation, delving into the legal implications and the potential threats to the accused student's safety. The next sections will explore the unfolding events, providing a comprehensive overview while maintaining clarity and adherence to the established guidelines.

The controversy surrounding Prathamesh Shindhe's offensive Instagram video has triggered a wave of protests at NIT Srinagar, with students and the community demanding redress. Eyewitnesses at Amar Singh and Islamia Colleges in Srinagar reported hundreds of students, including females, gathering inside the campuses, vehemently expressing their intolerance for remarks against Prophet Muhammad. The incident gained traction through a circulated video, showcasing students rallying against the accused and fervently calling for appropriate action.

The echoes of protest within the campuses of Amar Singh and Islamia Colleges underscore the depth of sentiment among the students. A student passionately articulated, "We can tolerate anything, but anything against our Prophet is intolerable to Muslims. He is our role model, our guide." The video circulated online captures the intensity of the protests, revealing a community united in its condemnation of Prathamesh Shindhe's controversial Instagram video.

The protests extended to NIT Srinagar, where demonstrators blocked both institution gates in Nigeen and continued their impassioned plea for justice inside the campus. The controversy has sparked discussions on the delicate balance between freedom of expression and responsible communication. As the campus uproar intensifies, questions about the boundaries of expression and the consequences of offensive content become central to the discourse.

Professor Atiq-u-Rehman, the Registrar at NIT Srinagar, confirmed an ongoing investigation to ascertain any violations of guidelines or policies. The call for justice reverberates through the campus, setting the stage for a broader conversation on the nuanced intersection between freedom of expression and the responsibilities that accompany it.

In a swift response to the alleged blasphemy incident, the student accused of hurting religious sentiments at NIT Srinagar has faced immediate consequences. As per media reports, the accused student has been barred from appearing for the semester exams and subsequently rusticated from the college. The severity of the actions taken by the school authorities raises questions about the balance between addressing religious sensitivities and ensuring fair treatment for the accused student.

According to news agency IANS, the school authorities, in response to the incident, have sent the accused student on leave. This move reflects the institution's attempt to manage the aftermath of the controversy and possibly defuse tensions on the campus. The repercussions faced by the accused student extend beyond legal consequences, impacting his academic pursuits and standing within the college community.

“Today evening at around 4.30, we received information that some students are protesting at the NIT campus (in Srinagar). After an initial investigation, it came to the fore that a student had posted some video on social media. It was not his own post but he had taken it from YouTube,” IGP Birdi said.

In shedding light on the matter, IGP Kashmir VK Birdi emphasized that the police acted promptly upon receiving information about the incident and a written letter from the registrar of NIT campus seeking legal action. The police have initiated actions under relevant laws and launched a formal investigation into the matter. The involvement of law enforcement signals the seriousness with which the authorities are treating the alleged blasphemy incident, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of the facts.

In the aftermath of the controversial social media post by an NIT Srinagar student, the administration took swift action, suspending all academic activities, exams, and administrative work on November 29. The student involved was sent home early in the morning, signaling a proactive response to contain the escalating tensions within the campus.

The severity of the situation prompted the attention of law enforcement, with Inspector General of Police, V K Birdi, confirming a registered case against protesting students and a commitment to take appropriate action following a thorough investigation. The administration's decision to halt all academic activities on November 29 aims to prevent further escalation of protests, with police and paramilitary personnel deployed on the premises to maintain order.

The Institute's closure for academic activities is a preventive measure, restricting access to the campus. A senior official emphasized the need for stringent measures and revealed that the institute has rusticated the student for a year. However, protesting students are advocating for more severe punishment, including the arrest of the accused.

A senior police officer disclosed that a case has been filed against the student under IPC sections 153 and 295, pertaining to promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion and destroying or defiling places of worship, respectively. The FIR was initiated following a letter from NIT's Registrar urging the police to take legal action against the accused student.

The alleged incident at NIT Srinagar unfolds against the backdrop of simmering tensions in another Kashmiri university. Recently, seven students from Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology at Shuhama were arrested under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. This arrest followed a complaint by a student who alleged threats and pro-Pakistan slogans were raised after Australia's victory against India in the cricket World Cup final.

The Jammu & Kashmir Police, facing criticism for the arrests, clarified on Tuesday that they had invoked a "softer provision" of the anti-terror law. The situation in the region has intensified with alarming slogans like 'Sar tan se Juda,' indicating a disturbing trend of targeting individuals on grounds of alleged blasphemy, reminiscent of the Nupur Sharma incident.

The blame against the Hindu student at NIT is exacerbated by the false narrative that his relationship with a Kashmiri Muslim girl is the main reason for the accusations. Disturbingly, slogans like "Hum Tera sar Tan se juda karne ke liye tyar hai" further amplify the vitriol against the student. Such calls for harm and violence are deeply concerning, reflecting a troubling environment where individuals are targeted based on their relationships and beliefs.

The situation raises questions about the state of free speech and expression, especially in an atmosphere where individuals are forced to flee for their safety. The reported actions against the student, including alleged suspension and being barred from exams, underscore the gravity of the situation. The disturbing trend of using blasphemy accusations as a tool to target individuals, coupled with the demand for extreme measures like 'Sar tan se Juda,' points to an urgent need for addressing such issues with sensitivity and a commitment to preserving the safety and rights of all individuals.

Mosab Hassan Yousef's Remarks in the Viral Video | 11-Year-Old Video That Sparked the NIT Srinagar Controversy

The recent turmoil at NIT Srinagar finds its roots in a resurfaced video featuring Mosab Hassan Yousef, the disowned son of senior Hamas leader Sheik Hassan Yousef. In the viral video, Mosab makes controversial statements about Prophet Muhammad during a conference, raising questions about the nature of Islam. He asserts, "Let’s look at Prophet Muhammad’s life. Did he kill people? Yes. Did he marry a 9-year-old child? Yes, he did." The provocative remarks continue, touching on historical events and concluding with the assertion that the "real nature of Islam is Evil."

Despite the recent resurgence of the video on social media, it's essential to note that this footage is not a recent occurrence but dates back 11 years. The video was captured during a debate event on March 15, 2012, at the Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles, United States. Mosab Hassan Yousef participated in a panel alongside Imam Jihad Turk, Reverend Canon Brian Cox, and Rabbi Mark Diamond.

This section of the article aims to provide context to the controversial video that triggered the unrest at NIT Srinagar. By examining the content and historical backdrop, readers can gain a nuanced understanding of the statements made by Mosab Hassan Yousef, contributing to a more informed perspective on the matter. The subsequent sections will continue to explore the implications of these remarks and their impact on the ongoing situation at NIT Srinagar.

In response to a query about Sharia law's treatment of non-Muslims, Mosab Hassan Yousef delivers a blunt perspective, stating, “Speaking the truth, I think what the Middle Eastern people need to know the real nature of Islam. Rather than creating model images of what Islam could be or my personal opinion of Islam as a tolerant religion. Islam is not a tolerant religion, there are a lot of tolerant Muslims brother Jihad here which I admire and I love unconditionally but in Islam, there is no tolerance. The tolerant verses in Islam were for political reasons.”

Mosab's assertion challenges prevailing notions and emphasizes the need for a candid understanding of Islam's true nature, distinguishing between the individual tolerance of Muslims and the inherent nature of the religion. He contends that supposedly tolerant verses in Islam were motivated by political considerations rather than reflecting intrinsic principles of tolerance.

Moving forward, Mosab directs attention away from the Quran and Islamic ideology, urging listeners to focus on Prophet Muhammad's life and behavior. He raises pointed questions about the Prophet's actions, including killing, marrying a nine-year-old, and the incident at the Jewish community of Khyber. These inquiries form a critical examination of the actions followed by jihad and the broader Muslim world.

The video captures Mosab's concluding remarks, questioning the perceived virtue of tolerance within Islam. He states, “Where is the tolerance if you regard it as a virtue? Muslims are tolerant people because I know my father and all my family and I know my people, but the real nature of Islam is evil, and this is based on my perfect knowledge of what Islam is.” This bold assertion challenges prevailing narratives and fuels the ongoing discourse surrounding the intersection of religion, tolerance, and individual perspectives.

In a compelling continuation of his reflections, Mosab Hassan Yousef asserts, “I was born to speak Arabic understand the language of the Quran. I know about the life of Muhammad from the most trusted resources and I can guarantee you that Muhammad did not tolerate but he took revenge from anybody who opposed him these are the facts that we need to tell our people.”

Mosab, drawing from his linguistic and cultural background, positions himself as a bearer of truth, grounded in extensive knowledge about the life of Prophet Muhammad. He challenges prevalent narratives, emphasizing the Prophet's lack of tolerance and his penchant for revenge against those who opposed him. This commitment to unveiling historical truths forms a crucial aspect of Mosab's advocacy.

Continuing his narrative, Mosab expresses a desire for a transformative movement in the Middle East. He declares, “I want to see what so-called the Arab Spring in the Middle East. I see people protesting against political regimes. I want to see the Middle East run protesting against the absolute control of religion, against Islam itself, against Allah himself in the streets. When we see that happening in the Middle East, then we can say that this is a spring, the European Spring was against the control of religion and religious authorities over people’s lives.”

This vision articulated by Mosab challenges conventional expectations of social movements, urging for a protest not just against political systems but against the religious authority itself. He draws parallels with the European Spring, emphasizing the need for a similar awakening in the Middle East. Mosab contends that unveiling the truth about Islam is paramount to catalyzing such a movement, advocating for an informed populace ready to challenge established religious norms.

In a powerful conclusion, Mosab reiterates his commitment to truth, stating, “It was not against political systems and this is what I want to see in the Middle East, and the only way to see this happening is by telling people the truth. I want to tell my people the truth of what Islam is,” encapsulating his mission to spark an intellectual awakening in the Middle East by confronting established religious narratives. This section unveils Mosab's aspirations and underscores the transformative potential of truth in reshaping societal perspectives.

Unraveling the Bhagwa Love Trap Conspiracy: Social Media's Dark Turn in NIT Srinagar Controversy

Amidst the NIT Srinagar controversy, a disturbing turn emerges as Islamists rake up the 'Bhagwa love trap' conspiracy theory, implicating the accused Hindu student in a relationship with a local Muslim girl. Social media becomes the battleground for a vitriolic exchange, with accusations and personal details exposed.

Notably, various social media users allege that the accused student is romantically involved with a local Muslim girl, terming it a 'Bhagwa love trap.' This conspiracy theory, widely peddled by some Muslim organizations and Islamists, asserts that Hindu men are deliberately ensnaring Muslim women. Instances of violence against Hindu men in the company of Muslim female friends have been reported, indicating the seriousness of the issue.

Several Islamist users on X go beyond verbal accusations, revealing personal details and pictures of the accused Hindu youth and the girl in question. These actions intensify the online assault, contributing to an environment of hostility and potential real-world consequences.

Adding fuel to the fire, Islamists target the Hindu youth, not only for his alleged relationship but also for being a Bihari and an 'outsider.' The online abuse takes a disturbing turn as one post reads, “Nobody should defend that girl who was in a relationship with that Bihari as she also is responsible for disrespect of our Prophet Muhammad SAW.” Such inflammatory statements contribute to an escalating wave of hatred and intolerance.

The situation reaches a harrowing extreme when an Islamist user openly threatens violence, stating that if the girl were his sister, he would have "chopped her in a thousand pieces and thrown to dogs," calling for her "exposure" and "humiliation." This alarming rhetoric raises concerns about the impact of online hate speech on real-world safety and underscores the urgency of addressing the escalating tensions.

As the NIT Srinagar controversy intensifies, a disturbing wave of hatred unfolds on social media, with Islamists launching vicious attacks on the accused Hindu student, Prathamesh. The onslaught includes racial slurs, accusations of blasphemy, and a chilling trend demanding the student's death.

In a shocking display of bigotry, an Islamist resorts to racial slurs, labeling Prathamesh as a "Pajeet," a derogatory term aimed at Indians. The vitriol reaches new heights as the Islamist expresses disgust at a Kashmiri girl allegedly being involved with a "Pajeet." This incident sheds light on the intersectionality of religious and racial prejudices, exposing the multi-layered nature of the hatred directed towards the accused Hindu youth.

The irony surfaces as Islamists, often portraying themselves as victims of persecution, reveal a stark contrast in their online behavior. Despite claiming to be targets of hatred, they unleash unbridled animosity towards non-Muslims, specifically targeting Hindus. The Hindu youth finds himself at the center of this storm, facing accusations of blasphemy merely for sharing an old video in which someone else criticizes Islam. This paradoxical dynamic underscores the complexity of online hate and the need for introspection within communities.

Taking their hostility a step further, Islamists on X initiate a trending hashtag, “#HangblasphmerPrathmeshNIT,” advocating for the death penalty for the Hindu student. This disturbing call for violence raises serious concerns about the impact of online rhetoric on real-world safety, emphasizing the urgency of addressing the toxic narratives perpetuated on social media platforms.

As the NIT Srinagar controversy escalates, Islamists intensify their onslaught by invoking the ominous slogan "Sar Tan Se Juda," signaling a call for the slaughter of anyone perceived to have 'insulted' Prophet Muhammad. The online environment becomes increasingly hostile, raising serious concerns about the safety of the accused, Prathamesh, and his family.

In a predictable move, Islamists turn to their familiar rallying cry, "Sar Tan Se Juda," a phrase that has become synonymous with calls for violence against those deemed to have blasphemed Prophet Muhammad. This ominous slogan adds another layer of menace to the already charged atmosphere, heightening fears of potential real-world repercussions for the accused Hindu student, Prathamesh.

As the online harassment intensifies, concerns mount over the safety of Prathamesh and his family. The vitriolic attacks, racial slurs, and threats have created an atmosphere of fear, prompting many to express apprehensions about the well-being of those targeted. This disturbing development underscores the tangible impact of online hate speech on the lives and safety of individuals, necessitating urgent intervention to curb the escalating tensions.

Beyond the immediate target, the prevailing tensions in Kashmir also raise broader concerns about the safety of non-locals in the region. The charged atmosphere, fueled by religious and regional prejudices, poses a threat to the well-being of individuals who may find themselves caught in the crossfire of heightened communal tensions.

As the NIT Srinagar controversy unfolds, eerie parallels emerge with past incidents, harking back to the violent riots and global outrage sparked by comments made by former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma about Prophet Muhammad. The aftermath of Sharma's remarks saw the chilling slogan "Sar tan se juda" raised, resulting in brutal reprisals, including the tragic killing of a Hindu tailor in Rajasthan. This historical context heightens concerns over the safety of Prathamesh and his Kashmiri girlfriend in the current scenario.

The present situation draws haunting parallels with the aftermath of Nupur Sharma's remarks, where the inflammatory slogan "Sar tan se juda" gained prominence. This slogan, synonymous with calls for violent retribution against those perceived to have insulted Prophet Muhammad, became a rallying cry that echoed across communities, leading to tragic consequences. The resurgence of this slogan in the context of the NIT Srinagar controversy intensifies apprehensions about the potential for real-world violence.

The haunting specter of past events raises concerns over the safety of Prathamesh and his Kashmiri girlfriend. In a disconcerting replay of history, Islamists have divulged personal information about the couple, coupled with threats of hanging and the ominous call for "Sar tan se juda." These developments underscore the urgency of addressing the safety of individuals targeted in the current controversy, drawing attention to the broader issue of safeguarding lives in the face of escalating tensions.